Come on , Airnav. We seem to have network problems again!
No problems at all reported for the last 24 hours. This issue is well explained by our support: in V3.01 lat/long timeout setting are very strict so if you don't have data for the last 30 seconds flights will be hidden from the screen. We will "relax" this for V3.02.
RadarBox Network Stats:
2009-Jul-27 Mon ^ 0 0 hrs, 0 mins, 0 secs 100.000%
2009-Jul-28 Tue 1 0 hrs, 19 mins, 49 secs 98.624%
2009-Jul-29 Wed 0 0 hrs, 0 mins, 0 secs 100.000%
2009-Jul-30 Thu 0 0 hrs, 0 mins, 0 secs 100.000%
Looks OK to me.
With me , it did not come back on until around 20.15. There was no response for at least 1 hour. I could not report it because I could not even send you any details through the forum. I did check that the connection at this end was working ok by going onto my own emails and everything was ok.
Roll on V3.02 !
Edit: I should also have added that at the time the network box at the bottom of the screen was showing red not green even though the box for getting flights from the radarbox network was ticked.
Hi there,
Same here EK01,no network flights until 20.15.Also,like yourself AirNav connection faliure,checked my end,all o.k,but could not get into the AirNav site to say anything.
Regards Terry.
Quote from: Terry on July 30, 2009, 07:50:57 PM
Hi there,
Same here EK01,no network flights until 20.15.Also,like yourself AirNav connection faliure,checked my end,all o.k,but could not get into the AirNav site to say anything.
Regards Terry.
Comments airnav !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do you mean that you couldn't access the forum either? I've been on since about 7.15 pm UK time and checking back, my first post was around 7.30 pm
---------------
AirNav RadarBox / AirNav RadarBox Discussion / Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.01 Beta on: Today at 07:25:48 pm
Quote from: southcoast on Today at 06:17:50 pm
Hi, Re Alert probs with Beta 3, done a full install of beta 3.1, the probs ........ etc
Quote from: Allocator on July 30, 2009, 08:09:20 PM
Do you mean that you couldn't access the forum either? I've been on since about 7.15 pm UK time and checking back, my first post was around 7.30 pm
---------------
AirNav RadarBox / AirNav RadarBox Discussion / Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.01 Beta on: Today at 07:25:48 pm
Quote from: southcoast on Today at 06:17:50 pm
Hi, Re Alert probs with Beta 3, done a full install of beta 3.1, the probs ........ etc
Correct Allocator. Could not access the forum either. As with Terry 's comments above there seemed to have been a complete failure. AS I say there was no problem with the network at the time as I was able to get onto Google, etc.
Ian
So I could access the forum and you and Terry couldn't - most odd. You can see the time of my post in this extract below.
AirNav RadarBox / AirNav RadarBox Discussion / Re: RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.01 Beta on: Today at 07:25:48 pm
I wonder if you both use the same ISP? I'm using Orange Mobile at the moment.
Allocator - your messages are timed at GMT - connection timings are probsbly local - 1 hour difference!!!!
I think they are talking about approx 10 minutes before your first message!!!
Hi there Allocator,
I reverted back to Beta 3.0 because of the constant my flights drop out with version 3.1,and i`m still getting drop outs,but not so frequent with version 3.0.This evening was a complete network faliure,no network flights,could not access AirNav site,checked my internet diagnostics,all ok,went straight on to Airframes site plus other sites no problems,tried AirNav site,no go!My experience tonight is exactly the same as EK01.
Regards Terry.
P.S i`m using Pipex(now Tiscali i believe).
We do guarantee that the server is up and running perfectly without a single failure for the last 72 hours. See the check log below:
Timestamp Location Result Size Time
2009-07-30 21:01:46 GMT Las Vegas USA OK 78.5 8.89
2009-07-30 20:41:46 GMT London GBR OK 86.8 1.44
2009-07-30 20:21:46 GMT Hong Kong CHN OK 104.9 3.92
2009-07-30 20:01:46 GMT Chicago USA OK 115.3 0.80
2009-07-30 19:41:47 GMT Sydney AUS OK 119.3 4.27
2009-07-30 19:21:47 GMT Atlanta USA OK 107.5 0.55
2009-07-30 19:01:46 GMT Shanghai CHN OK 113.6 9.29
2009-07-30 18:41:43 GMT Oklahoma City USA OK 108.2 1.46
2009-07-30 18:21:42 GMT Las Vegas USA OK 120.5 1.62
2009-07-30 18:01:43 GMT London GBR OK 120.9 2.69
2009-07-30 17:41:43 GMT Hong Kong CHN OK 129.6 5.46
2009-07-30 17:21:42 GMT Chicago USA OK 114.2 2.28
2009-07-30 17:01:42 GMT Sydney AUS OK 114.5 3.84
2009-07-30 16:41:43 GMT Atlanta USA OK 129.6 0.58
2009-07-30 16:21:42 GMT Shanghai CHN OK 133.9 13.60
2009-07-30 16:01:43 GMT Orlando USA OK 122.9 0.66
2009-07-30 15:41:42 GMT Oklahoma City USA OK 116.2 1.48
2009-07-30 15:21:42 GMT Las Vegas USA OK 128.9 1.26
2009-07-30 15:01:42 GMT London GBR OK 122.5 3.85
2009-07-30 14:41:42 GMT Hong Kong CHN OK 123.3 4.41
2009-07-30 14:21:43 GMT Chicago USA OK 110.9 1.01
2009-07-30 14:01:43 GMT Sydney AUS OK 137.4 4.34
2009-07-30 13:41:43 GMT Atlanta USA OK 126.1 1.66
2009-07-30 13:21:42 GMT Shanghai CHN OK 116.4 10.12
2009-07-30 13:01:43 GMT Orlando USA OK 115.6 0.58
2009-07-30 12:41:43 GMT Oklahoma City USA OK 123.0 1.72
2009-07-30 12:21:42 GMT Las Vegas USA OK 129.4 1.50
2009-07-30 12:01:42 GMT London GBR OK 146.6 3.16
2009-07-30 11:41:42 GMT Hong Kong CHN OK 148.0 4.82
2009-07-30 11:21:43 GMT Chicago USA OK 145.3 1.62
2009-07-30 11:01:42 GMT Sydney AUS OK 151.3 4.63
2009-07-30 10:41:42 GMT Atlanta USA OK 149.8 0.74
2009-07-30 10:21:42 GMT Shanghai CHN OK 134.1 6.61
2009-07-30 10:01:42 GMT Orlando USA OK 134.8 1.65
2009-07-30 09:41:43 GMT Oklahoma City USA OK 132.0 2.84
2009-07-30 09:21:42 GMT Las Vegas USA OK 134.6 1.21
2009-07-30 09:01:42 GMT London GBR OK 123.5 1.96
2009-07-30 08:41:42 GMT Hong Kong CHN OK 136.9 5.07
2009-07-30 08:21:43 GMT Chicago USA OK 120.1 0.83
2009-07-30 08:01:43 GMT Sydney AUS OK 123.5 4.16
2009-07-30 07:41:42 GMT Atlanta USA OK 120.5 0.50
2009-07-30 07:21:42 GMT Shanghai CHN OK 119.0 16.85
2009-07-30 07:01:42 GMT Orlando USA OK 120.0 0.56
2009-07-30 06:41:42 GMT Oklahoma City USA OK 120.3 35.03
2009-07-30 06:21:42 GMT Las Vegas USA OK 113.0 1.01
2009-07-30 06:01:42 GMT London GBR OK 109.4 1.76
2009-07-30 05:41:42 GMT Hong Kong CHN OK 96.8 3.65
2009-07-30 05:21:43 GMT Chicago USA OK 81.5 0.56
2009-07-30 05:01:42 GMT Sydney AUS OK 61.1 2.33
2009-07-30 04:41:43 GMT Atlanta USA OK 50.4 0.32
2009-07-30 04:21:42 GMT Shanghai CHN OK 45.2 3.28
2009-07-30 04:01:42 GMT Orlando USA OK 36.7 0.31
2009-07-30 03:41:42 GMT Oklahoma City USA OK 36.0 0.68
2009-07-30 03:21:43 GMT Las Vegas USA OK 34.1 0.54
2009-07-30 03:01:43 GMT London GBR OK 32.0 0.78
2009-07-30 02:41:42 GMT Hong Kong CHN OK 31.6 1.88
2009-07-30 02:21:43 GMT Chicago USA OK 28.6 0.36
2009-07-30 02:01:42 GMT Sydney AUS OK 25.3 1.60
2009-07-30 01:41:42 GMT Atlanta USA OK 23.0 0.24
2009-07-30 01:21:42 GMT Shanghai CHN OK 24.5 2.69
2009-07-30 01:01:43 GMT Orlando USA OK 22.2 0.29
2009-07-30 00:41:42 GMT Oklahoma City USA OK 30.1 0.74
2009-07-30 00:21:42 GMT Las Vegas USA OK 26.7 0.48
2009-07-30 00:01:43 GMT London GBR OK 34.0 0.91
2009-07-29 23:41:42 GMT Hong Kong CHN OK 34.3 1.85
2009-07-29 23:21:42 GMT Chicago USA OK 34.2 0.36
2009-07-29 23:01:42 GMT Sydney AUS OK 37.6 1.66
2009-07-29 22:41:42 GMT Atlanta USA OK 48.1 0.50
2009-07-29 22:21:42 GMT Shanghai CHN OK 49.6 2.93
2009-07-29 22:01:43 GMT Orlando USA OK 51.5 0.36
2009-07-29 21:41:27 GMT Las Vegas USA OK 60.8 0.71
2009-07-29 21:21:27 GMT London GBR OK 65.5 1.22
A quick look at your IPs from EK and Terry suggests you both are on the same ISP. There might have a been something not quite working on your ISP route to us during that hour.
Quote from: jgrloit on July 30, 2009, 09:03:17 PM
Allocator - your messages are timed at GMT - connection timings are probsbly local - 1 hour difference!!!!
I think they are talking about approx 10 minutes before your first message!!!
Nope, not GMT but UK local time (BST) - lets see what time the forum stamps this post with. It's 22:20 or 10.20 pm right now.
Hi AirNav,
If as you say we are using the same ISP,then,as we both suffered the same faliure,i will agree that it must be our ISP that caused or created this strange behavior.I will get in touch with them to see what explanation,if any,they can come up with,thanks for your time AirNav.
Best Regards Terry.
Well, I also lost connection to the network and forum for a while this evening, while still being able to access the rest of the web.
And I too am with Toucan/Pipex/Tiscali - isn't it Carphone Warehouse this week?
Rod
Hi Rod,
Warehouse is about right,shoved inside and forgotten about,time i think for a change?.That makes 3 of us having the same problem,so it must be the ISP having a laugh!.When i get hold of their customer service people they will morph their faces when i unload on them,i can assure you of that!"TAKE NO PRISONERS"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Regards Terry.
as of 0957 I am connected to the internet but am unable to get network flights here in Motherwell UK.
Quote from: rUNWAY 31 on July 31, 2009, 08:58:22 AMas of 0957 I am connected to the internet but am unable to get network flights here in Motherwell UK.
As at 10:08bst, getting 550+ aircraft on the network, so working okay now.
I think the network is very unstable at present, I am showing zero at the moment, but it comes and go.
This problem has already been covered by AirNav.
Andy
As at 11.40 in midlands UK i have no network coverage. Am i suffereing from the same problem or is it down? It was working fine yesterday so have nothing unticked etc. Is there a proper place to look to see if the network is down?Maybe a post on the forum form Airnav first rather than waiting for the users to try and suss it out might be a good idea?
Chris (and others), at 12:00 noon (UK time) I am also without network contact in Manchester. This is a network problem not something you have done nor is it connected to version 3.01 Beta as I can't get the network with version 2.0 either. Regarding your question about whether there is somewhere to go to check the status of the network I have made a suggestion that we might have a network status webpage on http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=2885.135 (http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=2885.135).
Folks.
If you read back you will see that Airnav have acknowledged the problem and will be releasing a fix with the next 3.02B version.
The problem shows itself as the network timing out and then reconnecting itself.
Jeremy.
Jeremy, I assume the "read back" you are referring to is Reply #9 in http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=3149.0 (http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=3149.0). Once again I'd point out that I don't have a network connection with unchanged RadarBox software version 2.0, so this is not a problem with user software but must be a problem with the host.
Using version 3.0 successfully for days on end so why would it suddenly be causing these network problems today. Yesterday had about 10 hours of uninterrupted coverage. Not with the same ISP as above - with AOL. It also isn't coming/going as is suggetsed. More going -has come back on briefly for 5 minutes twice in the last 2 hours and has been off for the rest.
Same here still on 3.0 was working fine until about 5 hours ago. No network traffic yet.
Airnav,
There would now appear to be several of us suffering from the same network problems.
It is true that Terry, Rod Bearden and myself are all using Tiscali but now we have Chris Kelham with the same problems and he is using AOL. I now see that Storm and rUNWAY 31 also have a network problem.
I would suggest that a thorough check of the systems is made at your end as in spite of a long list from yourselves allegedly showing no problems there is quite clearly something not right and it is nothing to do with the 30 second refresh problem when it is off for more than an hour on occasion.
Now it is a real network problem. We had to stop the server to debug the server application. We hope everything would be Ok (and this problem FINALLY corrected) in 1 to 3 hours. Our sincere apologies for this.
Airnav,
Thanks for your response. I was beginning to think I was alone in this problem therefore glad to see several others were also in the same position. Hopefully, as you say you can FINALLY rectify the problem occuring with the server.
Can you please advise us if possible via email when up and running again.
Thanks,
Ian
Network's back.
The server is running again. We have made some changes but we are not 100% sure that we corrected the problem. Work will continue here to debug and monitor the situation.
Adding to the above expect to see some network ups and downs during the next 3 hours.
We have finished maintenance works on the RadarBox server. A few problems corrected and some fine tuning done. We will keep it under closed watch during the 4 days but everything should be much more stable now.
Airnav,
Still a little bit erratic but certainly nothing as bad as it was over he last couple of days.
Thanks,
Ian
This problem of cutting out is getting worse. It's now starting to affect trying to participate in discussion threads which are either so slow in being sent or run out of time and don't send at all and before we hear the usual excuse of 'it must be something to do with your IP', I can assure you it isn't as all tests have been done with both the IP provider and through MIcrosoft. Instead of waiting for the next version of the full RB to be released can someone in Airnav send out a patch whereby we can have it fixed now !
Ian
a real fix. the situation is the same for me. i cannot bear with it, as ian suggested put out a patch just for this issue and i will tolerate the others. i'm back to v2
thanks
frank, sardinia
Quote from: sterigia on August 08, 2009, 11:56:08 AM
a real fix. the situation is the same for me. i cannot bear with it, as ian suggested put out a patch just for this issue and i will tolerate the others. i'm back to v2
thanks
frank, sardinia
hi.
i am the same driving me mad.
pat
Please rememeber this is a beta version which is having this issue. We are hoping to release the full version of 3 with the 64bit drivers which is causing a delay in the final version.
We will look into whether we can release a beta version prior to that with this fix.
Today does seem to be particularly bad (I'm on AOL)
Paul
thank you support i am conscious that it is a beta version and it has bugs. i have a 32 bit version but problems are the same
saluti
frank
I've noticed that the attempting to load pages on this forum is getting progressively slower - is this part and parcel of the server problems?
DC
We are investigating why the site is slower.
Quote from: AirNav Support on August 08, 2009, 12:57:26 PM
Please rememeber this is a beta version which is having this issue. We are hoping to release the full version of 3 with the 64bit drivers which is causing a delay in the final version.
We will look into whether we can release a beta version prior to that with this fix.
Airnav,
Please, please issue a patch for this network problem urgently ! We realise there is an issue with Microsoft re permissions etc for 64 bit machines over which you have no direct control but this network problem which we understand has been fixed for some time now requires an immediate patch to be sent out along with an investigation into the slow running or non existant connections with the forum.
The number of complaints would appear to be steadily increasing as shown from the above responses but with little action from your end.
Ian
i totally agree with ian, now even the forum is slow
frank, sardinia