When we have news, the forum will be the first to know :)
OK, that's pretty much the answer I expected, thanks for the confirmation.
We have deleted some of the posts which were not helpfull for the discussion.
Just to make clear to you Dave we are still 100% behind developing RadarBox further and MLAT is one of those major feature to come. Obviously this not something which can be done overnight and does require large amounts of testing and server tuning to handle the proccessing.
We haven't shelved the idea and no one outside the employees of AirNav Systems knows more than you do at the moment.
Quote from: AirNav Support on June 25, 2010, 10:52:43 AMObviously this not something which can be done overnight and does require large amounts of testing and server tuning to handle the processing.
OK, I certainly would not dispute that.
However, 5 months down the line, you must at least have formed a conclusion as to whether MLat will require new hardware, or will be possible with the current box. Can you share that with us ?
Speaking as one of a small number of individuals who knows what's involved in developing MLat solutions using enthusiast Mode S receivers, I'm sure you will forgive my natural scepticism.
Sorry Dave but at present we cannot release that information at the moment. (I am sure our competitors are very interested to know this and hence we are keeping tight lipped)
Quote from: AirNav Support on June 25, 2010, 11:27:19 AMSorry Dave but at present we cannot release that information at the moment. (I am sure our competitors are very interested to know this and hence we are keeping tight lipped)
Thank you.
Feel free to delete any posts in this thread that you feel are nugatory :-)