Troubleshooting the spurious position bug

[pjm]

But I would certainly agree that GLF5s seem to be the main culprits.

Captured this one over Sydney a while ago. (click to enlarge)

[bratters]

Gulf5 id SAM  special air mission @ 7448 nm time 10.42 today

[eggplant]

AirNav - Can you confirm this issue will (or will not) be put on the bug list ?

http://www.airnavsystems.com/bugs/

Thanks

[bratters]

Another oddment @ 1505 hrs today SE-MAJ callsign WLX900 at 1726 nm from central england.

[DaveReid]

Another oddment @ 1505 hrs today SE-MAJ callsign WLX900 at 1726 nm from central england.

British Aerospace ATP - say no more :-)

[Jeremy]

ATP?
J.

[DaveReid]

Yes, ATP.

[Pinza]

British Aerospace ATP - say no more :-)

Just managed to take my first 3D screenshot of a BAe ATP behaving properly.

Shame no model or livery available yet, but nice to see it climbing out over Warwickshire with correct transmissions!

[Jeremy]

I am sorry. I am being nieve and I just thought a non-sarcastic answer would help. ATP? 73 de J.

[DaveReid]

I am sorry. I am being nieve and I just thought a non-sarcastic answer would help. ATP? 73 de J.

Well it would help if we understood what it is that you want to know.  Simply posting "ATP?" would suggest that you wanted confirmation of what you've already been told :-)

Are you asking what an ATP is ?

www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&q=ATP+aircraft

[Jeremy]

I am sorry. I am being nieve and I just thought a non-sarcastic answer would help. ATP? 73 de J.

Well it would help if we understood what it is that you want to know.  Simply posting "ATP?" would suggest that you wanted confirmation of what you've already been told :-)

Are you asking what an ATP is ?

www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&q=ATP+aircraft

DR,
Thank you.
Oh come on!!!!!
J.

[DaveReid]

I give up, then.