RAF v Isle of Man

[AirNav Development]

So can you send me an email with what the competitor has that we don't so we can implement it in an upgrade?

[Roadrunner]

So can you send me an email with what the competitor has that we don't so we can implement it in an upgrade?

Mine was an observation,. No I will not as you keep making out you are so clever, you figure it out :-)

[AirNav Development]

:-)

[Allocator]

I am sure we can all find things from each of the systems that fits with what we want. I have both machines so use elements from each that I like. No one system has the monopoly on good ideas :-)

It's one thing having good ideas, and a totally different thing to implement them!  I don't bother running my SBS-1 now, as it doesn't give me anything I cant get from RadarBox.

Of course, my SBS-1 is Ethernet capable so I can run the laptop wirelessly in the garden and watch the aircraft via BaseStation with the SBS-1 in the house.  However, I did have to invalidate my guarantee by carry out what Kinetic described as a "hack" and the "butchering" of my SBS-1 to achieve this!

Local wireless networking of RadarBox would be a nice option, but just how many people would want it is questionable.

Choice of what is shown in the aircraft label would be nice though.

Can't think of much else.

[Roadrunner]

I think it is like anything. Not everyone buys the same make of car, or fridge or etc etc etc.

I like both my machines and I cant choose between them most of the time but if push comes to shove, I like my first-born the most as it has been with me longest - If you know what I mean :-)