Database Update Requests

LSZS · October 16, 2011, 09:28:33 PM

Founded today in the LIMC area this unpopulated frame whitout callsing information:

3003D4

Bye Stefano

X · October 17, 2011, 05:45:45 AM

Quote from: X on October 03, 2011, 06:16:12 AM
Andrew

As I could not see it, I just hope the flight number given later is not a clue to what I think it might be.....Jordanian Air Force IL76MF ex Russia 76954???

*076C94 f/n 76954 Not Allocated 2011/10/03 01:46:18 climbing from 4000ft thru f/l 100 departing UAE

X

Andrew and Alan

This is as I guessed now confirmed as JY-JID IL76MF Jordanian International Air Cargo ex Russia 76954 c/n ?0?34 23808 (full c/n not yet confirmed).
.
Seen Hahn 16/10/11

Correct code for JY-JID is apparently 742924

X

X · October 17, 2011, 08:15:16 AM

Alan

Believe that 6831C8 has been tied to UP-F1001 F100 Fokker 100 Caspiy Airlines c/n 11384 but will confirm both this and 6831CC being UP-F1002 later.

X

Runway 31 · October 17, 2011, 08:21:06 AM

Many thanks Stephano, I dont have anything for nothing for 3003D4 however.

Regards

Alan

Runway 31 · October 17, 2011, 08:24:46 AM

Morning X

742924, JY-JID, Ilyushin Il-76MF-90EI, c/n 1063423808, Jordan International Cargo/ Jordan - Air Force. Also added using the miscode.

Awaiting your confirmation on the F100.

Thanks

Alan

X · October 17, 2011, 08:34:48 AM

Alan

Another miscode picked up

E47DDF EP-CFO F100 Fokker 100 11389 Iran Air (using code of ex reg PT-MQE) should be 730CCF

X

X · October 17, 2011, 09:01:18 AM

Alan

Two new unknowns with two returning

7C1C4F
AE29C9 f/n UAV at FL470
AE1277 EC130H Davis Monthan believed to be either 73-1587 or 73-1592
60003E Noted again after over two years somewhere in the wilderness

X

Runway 31 · October 17, 2011, 09:12:20 AM

X

7C1C4F, VH-FVL. Aerospatiale ATR 72-212A, c/n 974, Skywest Airlines/Virgin Australia

Nothing on the others

Thanks

Alan

X · October 17, 2011, 10:21:17 AM

Alan

894002 A9C-BA just departed showing as a R722, surely it should be a B722!

X

Runway 31 · October 17, 2011, 10:35:35 AM

X

As fas as I am aware A9C-BA is a Boeing 727-2M7/Adv (RE) Super 27 and therefore comes under the ICAO R722 as opposed to a B722

Alan

X · October 17, 2011, 10:56:59 AM

Alan

That explains it, but never noted a R722 before...guess due to the rarity. ACW367 did update me on a few of the type changes in the new db and the reasons why. Just looked like a typo at first glance.

X

chewycanes · October 17, 2011, 11:00:45 AM

Welcome back Alan.

E4886B PP-MMF Falcon 2000 (from ModeS & GA)
4CA5DD No data

Thanks
Brian

Runway 31 · October 17, 2011, 12:05:16 PM

Afternoon Brian,

Thanks for the Falcon but nothing on the other one though.

Alan

Runway 31 · October 17, 2011, 12:06:57 PM

X

No problems, it shows the re-engining etc compared to a normal 727. I would rather you forwarded anything you think it incorrect than ignore something, so no worries.

Alan

X · October 17, 2011, 01:23:22 PM

Alan

As you mention it and not a mistake but just a small point on consistency (and I know this does not affect you all in Blighty) but some flydubai are entered in the new db as Fly Dubai and others Flydubai, I had it in my old db as flydubai.

nasair short for National Air Services show up differently rather than one or the other (and the aircraft carry nasair and flynas.com t/s). Some were originally VIP and had no titles (originally named Al Khayali) but for instance VP-CAN is now operating scheduled services in full nasair scheme (db is correct on this but has VP-CXT as National Air services). There maybe a reason but not aware of it.

Sorry if I sound pedantic!

X

PS. But thank goodness you use US - Air Force rather than the old USA - Air Force (took me hours to change last db!)