V3.0 Official Countdown has Started

Started by AirNav Development, June 15, 2009, 02:36:20 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

radarspotter10

Quote from: Brian on June 15, 2009, 07:26:21 AM
Why wait till the 3.0 is release....
AirNav Dev, You want to start a 4.0 topic When it's going be release within the next 5 years or so  ;)

Just put a big date on it :)

its Monday Brian and i dont like Mondays Brian, gone give us a break Brian,
well done TEAM AIRNAV.
from pat

malc41

Have I missed something, but what is the time scale of the release?
15 Miles East of EGNJ

tarbat

Quote from: malc41 on June 15, 2009, 09:26:06 AMHave I missed something, but what is the time scale of the release?

Quote from: AirNav Development on June 15, 2009, 02:36:20 AMAfter hundreds of programming hours V3.0 final compilation is being sent today to our beta testing team.

So, assuming it passes closed beta testing, it can't be long until it goes public.

malc41

Thanks tarbat

Just quick glanced at the post, busy doing the day job

Cheers
15 Miles East of EGNJ

LiveATC


tarbat


LiveATC


Canonjohns40D

Cheers for the update Airnav V3 sounds cool so roll on the public release.

John
Hi I'm John... and I'm a Radarbox User. I'm based in Bangor Co Down Northern Ireland.

malc41

15 Miles East of EGNJ

Deadcalm

Did I read somewhere that the + and - values for climb and descent had been replaced by corresponding up and down arrows?  It's not evident in Tarbat's live displays.

DC
Go around, I say again go around...

AirNav Development

We have changed this one again back to +/- has we were having too many problems with some Windows font types.
Contact Customer/Technical support via:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/contact.html
[email protected]

t1mb0

why bother trying to add unecessary features, a +/- is fine, in any case you can colour code ascending/descending
12m SE of EGHI

Deadcalm

You know, for what it's worth, that's a sad loss for the sake of a font.

I can't really see the need to change fonts, other than size.  I seem to remember in NATS there was some discussion about this for our in-house radar replay software - we decided on a sans-serifed font (Verdana, I believe).

Is it really necessary to change fonts?  I would have thought the benefit of the arrows far outweighed a gimmicky font change.

Just my honest opinion.

DC
Go around, I say again go around...

RodBearden

I for one prefer +/- to arrows - much easier to see than the arrows, especially at smaller sizes, and I like the ability to choose fonts - I'm a Verdana man myself, but in previous discussions on the forum, there is a variety of opinions out there on fonts.

Rod
Rod

malc41

15 Miles East of EGNJ