RELEASED - AirNav RadarBox 2009 - 3.0 Beta

Started by AirNav Development, June 18, 2009, 08:36:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

titigti

#105
Hello,

thanks for doing all the good work to get version 3 online!

I life in the Netherlands  9 miles from ehrd 21 from eham.
So i have a lot of traffic during the  day. more then 3000 planes.


But when i turn on fix, the system get to slow to work with. To much fix points around this area .

check my site to see the area.
fix is now turned off, only airports are on.


www.titigti.com/radar/

I'm using vista, with a intel duel core 2 gig.

All the other old bugs, like slow menu's seems to be ok now.


Greetings
Etienne




dudbaker


Unfortunately, I took the precaution of renaming the existing Radarbox folder to "Old Radarbox" and when I try to run that version I get the same error message.


[/quote]

I did not rename but still cannot run old version.  No RB, at all, at the moment.

Dudley
Dudley Baker
Stansted
G8THH
[email protected]
Valiant, Victor, Shackelton, Canberra, VC10, Tornado Typhoon 737 747 A320 A300 Engineer.

Fenris

Quote from: snowman on June 19, 2009, 08:09:15 AM
Updated to V3.0 beta running Vista Ultimate 64bit and have a couple of questions

1) Has the driver issue been fixed or do I still have to hit F8 on start-up
2) What do I have to do to display up/down arrows as I am still seeing +/-

Otherwise seems to be working fine

If you look for a program called EasyBCD from NeoSmart you will be able to configure Vista64 not to require signed drivers, I don't have the 64 bit version but I do use EasyBCD.

Fenris

Quote from: dudbaker on June 19, 2009, 08:22:13 AM

Unfortunately, I took the precaution of renaming the existing Radarbox folder to "Old Radarbox" and when I try to run that version I get the same error message.



I did not rename but still cannot run old version.  No RB, at all, at the moment.

Dudley
[/quote]

It's likely to be one of the new files has overwritten the old versions in a directory other than the Airnav tree, so both versions have to use that file. That'll be why v2.01 is broken now.

You could reinstall it until v3.0 gets sorted out.

marcdeklerk

hi airnav, possibility to select the tracks of aircraft to be displayed even after aircraft time out? Then I can view the day's tracks that was logged.

What about adding various days in reporter? not just today and yesterday?

thanks

snowman

Quote from: Fenris on June 19, 2009, 08:28:47 AM
Quote from: snowman on June 19, 2009, 08:09:15 AM
Updated to V3.0 beta running Vista Ultimate 64bit and have a couple of questions

1) Has the driver issue been fixed or do I still have to hit F8 on start-up
2) What do I have to do to display up/down arrows as I am still seeing +/-

Otherwise seems to be working fine

If you look for a program called EasyBCD from NeoSmart you will be able to configure Vista64 not to require signed drivers, I don't have the 64 bit version but I do use EasyBCD.

Thanks - I'll try that

dudbaker

Brian

Thanks for the tip.  Where can I find it.
Dudley Baker
Stansted
G8THH
[email protected]
Valiant, Victor, Shackelton, Canberra, VC10, Tornado Typhoon 737 747 A320 A300 Engineer.

tarbat


mjleprix

Hi All
Had a little go at version 3 and generally my flights increased fron 46 to around 54, seems a lot smoother. info and routes well populated,some Flybee routes etc being received Not all, so well done so far. One anomally. seem top have lost ability to filter down to flights for last ten minutes or one hour.
Mike P

afo47

all seemes to be ok here on XP sp3 ... no problem
But why only MSG 3 on port 30003 ?
and now on this port also 5mn delayed like port 7879 !!
really bad and will continue to use sbs1 for tracking all types of
messages.
unpossible to use very nice add-ons sbs programs with anrb.
JLF

nortonbeak

I deleted the RadarBox folders and ran RegSeeker to tidy up the registry. Downloaded RadarBox V2. Restarted the laptop, ran the install of V2 and have got the original RadarBox software going again.

Hurrah!

sterigia

i have turned off fixes ndb vor small airports and routes to speed it up a bit
abnd all geographical detail too
definetely faster now
frank
ciao.
frank

John Racars

Hi Support,

My compliments with the great job you have done with your team of developers and testers.

I am verry under the impression of all the new improvements and new items you have brought to us today with this new version 3.0 Beta.

Superfluous to say that all is working verry smooth here with me.

Thank you verry much for this new version!
Best Regards from the Netherlands, John Racars
13 NM East of EHAM
-
ANRB:
Version: 3D - 5.00.072
Antenna: outside WiMo GP-1090 (with ECOFLEX 10 cableconnection)
PC: Windows 7 SP 1 - 64 bit
-
RadarBox24 station: EHAM4

EK01

#118
Hi guys,

I have uninstalled version 2 and reinstalled the full version 3. Flybe flights are still not showing their flight id's for dash 8's althought the Loganair SF 340's details are now showing along with route information. Any ideas ?

Also my home location appears to have moved. It's not showing the correct position according to what I had entered in Preferences.

Help appreciated.

Edit: Home Location now ok. Used Google Earth to reset. However in version 2 you used to be able to alter the size of the grid by moving your cursor down the side of it until 2 horizontal bars appeared and then moving it over to give a smaller grid and hence a bigger map horizontally. This does not seem to be there in version 3. Also having a closer look it would appear thet some flybes are giving full details and some are not. Perhaps Tarbat would know. Do all flybe dash 8 give flight id's.


tarbat

#119
Quote from: EK01 on June 19, 2009, 10:25:07 AMFlybe flights are still not showing their flight id's for dash 8's althought the Loganair SF 340's details are now showing along with route information. Any ideas ?

Flight IDs can take some time to appear.  On these non-ADS/B aircraft, a ModeS ground station has to request the information before you see it in Radarbox.  So, if there's no ground station nearby, you have to wait until the aircraft is high enough before a more distant ModeS ground station requests this squitter.  I think!!

During beta testing I made this observation:
Comparing Radarbox FlightIDs today against the FlightIDs seen by my friend's SBS-1, RB missed 20 FlightIDs.  Of course, this might well be caused by reception conditions being different in my friend's location.  In fact, there were 14 aircraft where RB detected a FlightID where the SBS-1 didn't.


Quote from: EK01 on June 19, 2009, 10:25:07 AMAlso my home location appears to have moved. It's not showing the correct position according to what I had entered in Preferences.

Check that you've ticked the box in Preferences to Draw Home Location Legend.