Main Menu

Version 3.02?

Started by dumpty, August 26, 2009, 07:13:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DaveReid

Quote from: John Racars on August 29, 2009, 04:31:05 PMI always have thought that a ModeS-code was unique.

When they are correct, they are.
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

airdata

The issue of 'crossed' flight ID's has been noted in Auckland, New Zealand on many occasions as well.  It seems to occur when the hex code of 2 different aircraft are similar (i.e. only a few digits apart).  Unlike the above replies - it is most certainly not the aircraft using the wrong hex code.  According to a local aircraft engineer, the hex code is set in the avionics bay of an airliner and cannot be changed by the crew.  It does appear to be a problem with the software where the flight ID is transposed to the wrong aircraft.  I am using version 3.01B and am hoping it will be resolved in 3.02.
Under the flight path, 5NM from runway 23L threshold at Auckland (NZAA), New Zealand.

John Racars

Hi All,

Thank you all for your reactions! It is clear to me now what the cause of problems like I showed to you can be.
Best Regards from the Netherlands, John Racars
13 NM East of EHAM
-
ANRB:
Version: 3D - 5.00.072
Antenna: outside WiMo GP-1090 (with ECOFLEX 10 cableconnection)
PC: Windows 7 SP 1 - 64 bit
-
RadarBox24 station: EHAM4

DaveReid

Quote from: airdata on August 30, 2009, 09:09:45 AMThe issue of 'crossed' flight ID's has been noted in Auckland, New Zealand on many occasions as well.  It seems to occur when the hex code of 2 different aircraft are similar (i.e. only a few digits apart).  Unlike the above replies - it is most certainly not the aircraft using the wrong hex code.  According to a local aircraft engineer, the hex code is set in the avionics bay of an airliner and cannot be changed by the crew.  It does appear to be a problem with the software where the flight ID is transposed to the wrong aircraft.  I am using version 3.01B and am hoping it will be resolved in 3.02.

This is intriguing, and not something I have personal experience of.

Could you provide a couple of examples of what you have described ?
This post has been scanned for any traces of negativity, bias, sarcasm and general anti-social behaviour

tarbat

Quote from: airdata on August 30, 2009, 09:09:45 AMIt seems to occur when the hex code of 2 different aircraft are similar (i.e. only a few digits apart).

Probably caused by not being able to parity check the transmissions, and bit-errors causing wrong hex-codes to be received.  See:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=1641.msg28677#msg28677
http://www.airnavsystems.com/forum/index.php?topic=3052.msg28434#msg28434

colinhall

Tarbat, help, have just downloaded the 3.0 and I dont have the airport outlines. Can you point me in the right direction please. Colin.

Allocator

Quote from: colinhall on August 31, 2009, 06:48:09 PM
Tarbat, help, have just downloaded the 3.0 and I dont have the airport outlines. Can you point me in the right direction please. Colin.

See the Downloads section of the RadarBox Utilities website

http://radarbox.gofreeserve.com/index.html

colinhall

Thanks for that Allocator. I could not remember where I could find it, thanks. Colin.

colinhall

Allocator, I have down loaded the outlines on the above website but they dont appear on the ANRB when I put it on. Im running it on my laptop on Vista and 64 bit(dont know if that makes any difference?) Colin.

tarbat

Colin, in which folder did you install ANRB?  If you installed in C:\Program Files, then you'll need to put the outlines in Vista's Virtual Store.

marcdeklerk

Airnav a bit of an update on 3.02 please thanks

AirNav Support

Its been a beta testing, the last final version had some issues (which is good they were caught) and hence we are fixing them as we type.
Contact Customer/Technical support via:
http://www.airnavsystems.com/contact.html
[email protected]

Jordan

Quote from: John Racars on August 29, 2009, 01:34:23 PM
Hi Support,

Are problems like you can see below also been fixed? As you can see the given route-information can not be correct.

Exemples like this I see verry much, and every time when I am running RadarBox.....

For your information: the network was switched off all the time!



OMG! 334 Myflights? :O
when i get 30 its amazing....

airdata

Quote from: DaveReid on August 30, 2009, 09:23:00 AM
Quote from: airdata on August 30, 2009, 09:09:45 AMThe issue of 'crossed' flight ID's has been noted in Auckland, New Zealand on many occasions as well.  It seems to occur when the hex code of 2 different aircraft are similar (i.e. only a few digits apart).  Unlike the above replies - it is most certainly not the aircraft using the wrong hex code.  According to a local aircraft engineer, the hex code is set in the avionics bay of an airliner and cannot be changed by the crew.  It does appear to be a problem with the software where the flight ID is transposed to the wrong aircraft.  I am using version 3.01B and am hoping it will be resolved in 3.02.

This is intriguing, and not something I have personal experience of.

Could you provide a couple of examples of what you have described ?

Here's a screenshot of 2 dupe flight ID's.  In past experience it has happened when the Hex code of the 2 aircraft is similar.  In this case this is not the case....

This was never a problem in version 2.  I am hoping it will be resolved with the new version when it does come out.
Under the flight path, 5NM from runway 23L threshold at Auckland (NZAA), New Zealand.

marcdeklerk

Airnav any update on the progress of V3.02 please